Profile of Critical Thinking Ability of Class VIII Junior High School Students in Science Learning on Simple Aircraft Materials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30736/seaj.v4i2.588Keywords:
Profile, Critical Thinking, Simple PlaneAbstract
In this 21st-century educational paradigm, the ability to think critically is one of the life skills that must be possessed to adapt to an increasingly developing life. This study aims to describe the profile of the critical thinking ability of junior high school students in science subjects on Simple Aircraft material. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. Qualitative descriptive research is research that is used to investigate the actual data and is described in the form of words - words or verbally. The subjects in this study were students of class VIII-BIL SMP N 1 Sine with a total of 30 children. The research instrument used in the form of 10 reasoned multiple choice questions (two-tier multiple choice) based on indicators of critical thinking ability according to Facione which is divided into 4 namely (1) interpretation (2) analysis (3) inference (4) evaluation. The results of the study show that students have moderate critical thinking skills, with a percentage of 40%. Meanwhile, based on indicators showing aspects (1) Interpretation has a percentage of 72.3% with a high category (2) analysis has a percentage of 56.7% with a medium category (3) inference has a percentage of 47.8% with a low category (4) evaluation has a percentage 40% with low category. This research is expected to be used as a benchmark for teachers to provide a learning system that encourages students to improve their critical thinking skills by involving students in taking an active role in learning. In addition, this research is expected to provide a reference for similar research or further research.Downloads
References
A’yun, Qurrota.(2020). Profil Ketrampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Smp Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa Pada Materi Tekanan Zat. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains, 9 (2) :1804-1811.
Afandi, Tulus J., dan Rachmi A. (2016). Implementasi DigitalAge Literacy dalam Pendidikan Abad 21 di Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains. Surakarta.
Agnafia, Desi Nuzul. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi.Florea.6(1): 45-53.
Cahyaningati, Endah Nur.(2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Open Ended Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient (AQ).Skripsi. Mojokerto : Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Islam Majapahit.
Cullinane, Alison dan Maeve Liston. (2011). Two-tier Multiple Choice Question: An Alternative Method of Formatif Assessment for First Year Undergraduate Biology Students. Limerick: National Center for Excellence In Mathematics and Education Science Teaching and Learning (NCE-MSTL).
Duran, M., & Dökme, I. (2016). The Effect Of The Inquiry-Based Learning Approach On Student’s Critical-Thinking Skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12 (12), 2887-2908.
Ennis, Robert.H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. Emeritus Professor, University of Illinois Last Revised, May, 2011.
Facione, A.Petter. (2013). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press, Millbrae, CA..
Febriani, Nurul. (2015). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Ditinjau Dari Gaya Berpikir Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Kelas VIII SMPN 1 Ngunut Tulungagung Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015. Skripsi. Tulungagung: Jurusan Tadris Matematika IAIN Tulungagung.
Husen, A., Indriwati, S.E., & Lestari, U. (2017). “Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Sma Melalui Implementasi Problem Based Learning Dipadu Think Pair Shareâ€. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, Vol.2 No.6, Hal 853-860.
IEA. (2015). Student Achievement Overview (Science) Grade 4. http://timss2015.org/timss-2015/science/student-achievement
Kivunja, Charles. (2015). Teaching Student To Learn And To Work Well With 21 Century Skills: Unpacking The Career And Life Skills Domain Of The New Learning Paradigm. International Journal Of Higher Education. 4(1): 2-11.
Kurnia, Alifia., dkk. (2021). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Menggunakan Soal Tes Pilihan Ganda Pada Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Indonesia Journal of Education Science (IJES), 4 (1), 27 -23.
Luchmayanti, Wafda .(2019). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Kontekstual Geometri Bertemakan Gudang Atag. Skripsi. Jember : Jurusan Pendidikan MIPA Universitas Jember.
Maslakhatunni’mah, Dewi.(2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Siwa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ipa Kelas VII SMP. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains.Surakarta
Normaya, Karim. (2015). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Menggunakan Model Jucama Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama, EDU-MAT Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Volume 3, Nomor 1, April 2015, hlm 92 – 104.
Nugraha, A, J., Suyitno, H., & Susilaningsih, E. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Ditinjau Dari Ketrampilan Proses Sains Dan Motivasi Belajar Melalui Model PBL. Journal of Primary Education, 6(1), 35 - 43
Nurazizah, S., Sinaga, P., & Jauhari, A. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Kognitif Dan Ketrampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA Pada Materi Usaha Dan Energi. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 192-202.
OECD(Organization For Economic Co-Operation And Development). (2018). Pisa 2015 Results In Focus. Retrieved From Www.Oecd.Org/Pisa/Pisa-2015-Results-In-Focus.Pdf.
Paringin, S., Mata, P., & Ipa, P. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas Ix. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya, 2006, 179–186
Permanasari, V., 2013. Efektivitas Pendekatan Pembelajaran Open-Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Trigonometri Ditinjau Dari Kreativitas Belajar Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Solusi, 1(1): 1-7.
Rosdiana, S.R.(2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Inquiry- Discovery. Science Education and Aplication Journal, 2(2), 101
Roudlo, M.P (2020). Kemapuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Kemandirian Belajar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Flipped Classroom Dengan Pendekatan STEM. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana, 20
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Yamtinah,S., Dkk.(2016). Item Discrimination of Two Tier Test. Proceeding Internasional Conference on educational Research and Evaluating (ICERE). 29-31 May 2016, Yogyakarta State University
Yaumi, Muhammad. (2012).Pembelajaran Berbasis Multiple Intelligences. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.
Rifa, Hanifa Mardhiyah,. Dkk. (2021). Pentingnya Ketrampilan Belajar di Abad 21 sebagai Tuntutan dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia.Lectura : Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1), 29 - 40.
Wijaya, Yuni Etistika,. Dkk. 2016. Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 Sebagai Tuntutan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Di Era Global.Prosiding Seminar Nasional pendidikan Matematika,Malang.
Kemendikbud. Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Sistem Ganda pada Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Kejuruan.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
