Integrating Bloom's Taxonomy into the Design of Final English Tests for Eighth Graders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30736/ej.v12i01.1216Keywords:
Assessment, Bloom's Revised Taxonomy, Cognitive Process Dimension, TestAbstract
Testing is essential in education because it helps teachers measure how much students have learned. Teachers typically use multiple-choice and essay questions for this purpose. This research examined what types of thinking skills English teachers focus on when creating final exams for eighth-grade students, using Bloom's educational framework as a guide. The study also looked at the difficulties teachers encounter while developing these tests. The researchers used interviews and systematic observation methods to gather information. They analyzed a 50-question test that included 45 multiple-choice items and 5 essay questions. The results revealed that the test mainly assessed three types of thinking: memorizing information, comprehending concepts, and analyzing material, with comprehension questions being the most common. Teachers identified two main challenges: limited time for test development and difficulty categorizing questions according to Bloom’s taxonomy. To address these issues, they suggested scheduling test creation during holidays and offering clearer institutional guidelines. They also recommended enhancing teachers’ understanding of Bloom’s taxonomy to improve test design. This study contributes to English language assessment by revealing a strong focus on lower-order thinking skills. It highlights the need for professional development and institutional support to help teachers design more balanced assessments that include higher-order thinking skills. Such improvements can lead to more effective language assessment practices aligned with broader educational goals.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, Shodiq. Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Konsep Dasar, Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 1993.
Amaliyah, Ayu., A Thesis:”An Analysis of Multiple Choice Items Made by the Teacher Based on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy Theory at Tenth Grade of SMAN 1 Sidoarjo ”. Surabaya: UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya , 2018.
Anderson, Lorin W., David R. Krathwohl, Peter W. Airasian, and Kathleen A. Cruikshank. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman, 2001.
Arifin, - Suryanto. Evaluasi Pembelajaran di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka, 2011. Arikunto, Suharsimi. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 1993.
Ayaturrochim., A Thesis: “The Analysis of Reading Tasks in “English in Focus”Textbook Based on Cognitive Domain of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy”. Bengkulu: Universitas Bengkulu, 2014.
Brookhart, Susan M. How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. United States of America: ASCD Publication, 2010.
Brown, H. Douglas. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. San Francisco State University: Longman, 2004.
Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. “Assessment for Learning: Formative Assessment”
Dahlan, Ahmad.,”Pengertian dan Peranan Evaluasi Pembelajaran” Eureka Pendidikan, (https://www.eurekapendidikan.com/2014/10/pengertian-dan-Peranan- evaluasi-pembelajaran.html, accessed on December 15, 2019)
Depdiknas. Panduan Analisis Butir soal. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2008.
LSP-ATDA., “Assessment Bukan Ujian” Astindo Training Center, (www.astindo.org/content/artikel/lspatda/70/0, accessed on December 15, 2019)
Masidjo, Ign. Penilaian Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1995.
Mestin, Mustafa, “Teachers’ Difficulties in Preparation and Implementation of Performance Task”. Bozok: Bozok University, 2013. DOI: 10. 12738/estp.2013.3. 1452
Nisa’, Nurul Khoirun., A Thesis:”An Analysis of English Final Test Construction Used by SMP and MTs in Nganjuk”. Surabaya: UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2018.
Norcini, John.”Criteria for Good Assessment: Consensus and Recommendation from the Ottawa 2010 Conference”. Medical Teacher. Vol. 33, 2013.206
Permendikbud Tahun 2016 No. 22
Purwanto, M. Ngalim. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2001.
Sudijono, Anas. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015. Suryanto, Adi. Evaluasi Pembelajaran di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka, 2011.
Teaching Methods, Foreign Language., “Speaking Lesson 3: Designing CommunicativeTask” (http://www.shanghairanking.com/wcu/wcu1/Tai.pdf, accessed on December 1, 2019)
Thoha, M.Chabib. Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 1991. Utari.,“Marketing Research: Research Design” Wilan’s Pensieve,
(https://uwilan.wordpress.com/2013/09/29marketing-research-
research-design/, accessed on December 16, 2019)
Widyoko, S. Eko Putro. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran: Panduan Praktis bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2009.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luky Dwi Ratnasari, Syafi'ul Anam, Ali Mustofa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.