Error Analysis of Cohesion Devices in High School Students' Recount Text Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30736/ej.v13i1.1351Keywords:
error analysis, cohesion devices, recount textAbstract
This study investigates errors in the use of grammatical cohesion devices in students’ recount writing at MA Ma’arif An-Nur. Grammatical cohesion is essential for creating coherent and meaningful texts; however, many EFL learners experience difficulties in using cohesive devices appropriately. This study aims to identify the types and patterns of errors in the use of grammatical cohesion devices.A qualitative descriptive design with an error analysis approach was employed. The data were collected from recount texts written by twenty tenth-grade students selected through purposive sampling. The analysis focused on four types of grammatical cohesion devices: reference, substitution, ellipsis, and conjunction.The findings indicate that reference and conjunction were the most frequently used cohesion devices and accounted for the majority of errors. Common errors included incorrect pronoun references and inappropriate use of conjunctions. In contrast, substitution and ellipsis were used less frequently, suggesting limited student mastery of these devices. The errors were influenced by students’ limited grammatical knowledge, first-language interference, and insufficient writing practice.In conclusion, students still face difficulties in applying grammatical cohesion devices accurately in recount writing. Therefore, more focused instruction and extensive writing practice are needed to improve students’ ability to produce coherent and cohesive texts.
Downloads
References
Abas, I. H., & Abd Aziz, N. H. (2016). Classification Of L2 Writing Process And Writing Strategies: Klasifikasi Proses Penulisan L2 Dan Strategi Penulisan. Proceedings of the ICECRS, 1(1), v1i1-505.
Ariwibowo, T., Hidayat, D. N., Husna, N., Alek, A., & Sufyan, A. (2023). A discourse analysis of cohesion
Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2013). The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. Routledge. devices an students’ writing of recount text. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Sosial, dan Agama, 9(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/329234
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Corder, S. P. (1974). Error analysis. Oxford University Press.
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (Eds.). (2016). Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction. New York: Routledge.
Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring How Texts Work. Primary English Teaching Association.
Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. A&c Black.
Farías, D. I. H., Hope, T., & Li, M. (2024, November). Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1990). How to design and evaluate research in education. Order Department, McGraw Hill Publishing Co., Princeton Rd., Hightstown, NJ 08520.
Gray, B., Biber, D., Hyland, K., Paltridge, B., & Wong, L. (2021). Corpus-based discourse analysis. The Bloomsbury Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 97-110.
Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2015). Halliday on language. The Bloomsbury companion to MAK Halliday, 137-202.
Hyland, K. (2015). Teaching and researching writing. Routledge.
Johnson, M. D., & Tabari, M. A. (2025). Linguistic complexity in second language writing: Insight from studies on task planning. Language Teaching, 58(1), 1-13.
Lestari, F. T., Astutik, I., & Werdiningsih, I. (2023). An analysis on cohesive devices of students’ recount paragraphs writing. Pubmedia Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 1(1), 1-16.
Li, Q. (2024). Error analysis of college English writing based on the cohesion and coherence theory. International Journal of English Linguistics, 14(2), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v14n2p73
McNamara, T., & Knoch, U. (2019). Fairness, justice and language assessment. Oxford University Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Sage
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. (No Title).
Putri, F. (2021). AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT (A Qualitative Research at the First Grade MIPA I of MAN 2 Aceh Besar) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Bina Bangsa Getsempena). http://etd.uinsyahada.ac.id/id/eprint/10328
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge university press.
Rahayu, I., Sitihindun, I., & Sapari, G. G. (2024). An Analysis the Use of Cohesive Devices In Recount Text by Eighth Grade Junior High School Students’. ARTISHTIC, 1(1).
Zahara, R., Yusuf, Y. Q., Samad, I. A., & Singh, C. K. S. (2023). Cohesive Devices in EFL Students' Essays and Problems Encountered during Writing. Indonesian Research Journal in Education| IRJE|, 7(1), 61-76. Zahara, R., Yusuf, Y. Q., Samad, I. A., & Singh, C. K. S. (2023). Cohesive Devices in EFL Students' Essays and Problems Encountered during Writing. Indonesian Research Journal in Education| IRJE|, 7(1), 61-76.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rani Syah Putri, Endah Nur Tjendani, Ribut Sabartono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


