Students’ Attitude in Using Artificial Intelligence Based Speaking Activity in Classroom

Authors

  • Achmad Anang Darmawan STKIP Al Hikmah Surabaya
  • Alfan Hariri, M.Pd STKIP Al Hikmah Surabaya
  • Dimas Vega STKIP Al Hikmah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/ej.v11i2.1125

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence , Students' Attitude, Speaking Activity

Abstract

With the vast applications that can be used for language learning, there are many research concern about the use of artificial intelligence based in language classroom. This research aims to explore students’ attitude toward the use of Speechace in speaking activity. This research uses qualitative research method which Students’ attitude can be explored deeply through comprehensive observation in the classroom activity such as how students’ response toward teacher elicitation by using chat boot. In addition, to confirm the finding from observation students thought need to be dig through interview. The subject of the study were 20 students of 8th grades MTS Alif lam miim Surabaya. The research revealed that students have positive attitude toward the Speechace in speaking activity. There are some reasons underlie this attitude such as content, features, and feasibility. In term of content, studnets assume that the contents of Speechace are relevant to their context either in school or home. In addition, Speechace are vary in features such as speaking, writing, listening or even writing. Last but not least, Speechace is user-friendly so students easily access features and contents even for the first visit of the application. Thus, students enjoy to use and continuously use Speechace in speaking class activity.

KeywordsArtificial Intelligence (AI); Students’ attitude;Speaking activity; etc.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ababio, B. T. (2013). Nature of Teaching : What Teachers Need to Know and Do 2. The Concept of Teaching. 1(2002), 37–48.

Abd El Fattah Torky, S. (2006). The Effectiveness of a Task- Based Instruction Program in Developing the English Language Speaking Skills of Secondary Stage Students. Ph.D. Dissertation. Curricula and Methods of Teaching Department, Women’s College, Ain Shams University.

Abu Shawar BA, Atwell ES. Chatbots: are they really useful? J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguist. 2007;22:29–49.

Agarwal, S., Agarwal, B., & Gupta, R. (2022). Chatbots and virtual assistants: A bibliometric analysis.

Alawi F. (2023). Artificial intelligence: The future might already be here. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology, 12, S2212-4403(23)00003-2

Brown, G. and G. Yule. (1983). Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). White Plains: Pearson Education.

Brown, H.D. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearson Education, Inc, 2007.

Chaney, A.L. and Burke T.L. (1998). Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Dale, R. (2016). The Return of The Chatbots. Natural Language Engineering, 22, 811-817.

Følstad A, Brandtzæg PB. Chatbots and the new world of HCI. Interactions. 2017;24(4):38–42.

Fryer, L., & Carpenter, R. (2006, September). Emerging Technologies: Bots as Language Learning Tools. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 8-14.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Pearson Longman.

Harmer. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Fourth Edition. England: Pearson Education Limited.

Hidayat, Komaruddin. Psikologi Kematian: Mengubah Ketakutan menjadi Optimisme. Jakarta: Mizan Publika, 2009

Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern language journal, 70(2), 125-132.

Maroengsit, W., Piyakulpinyo, T., Phonyiam, K., Pongnumkul, S., Chaovalit, P., & Theeramunkong, T. (2019, March).

Moloeng, L. J. (2005). Metode Penelitian. Bandung: PT. Remaja P. Karya

Mukminin A. (2012). Acculturative experiences among Indonesian graduate students in US higher education: Academic shock, adjustment, crisis, and resolution. Excellence in Higher Education Journal, 3(1), 14-36.

Nurhaida, Maulani. Improving Students’SpeakingAbilityUsingCooperative Script. Thesis. STKIP Siliwangi, 2017.

Pham, X. L., Pam, T., Nguyen, Q. M., Nguyen, T. H., & Cao, T. H. (2018).

Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2016). What Factors Influence the English Pronunciation of EFL Learners. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM), 6(2), 314–326

Quianthy. 1990. Speaking and Listening Competencies for College Students. http://www.natcom.org. Accessed on 10th of January 2016

Rajagopalan, I. (2019). Concept of Teaching. 5–8. Shanlax International Journal of Education.

Sholihah M. (2016) Teacher, & Faculty, E. Improving Students ’ Speaking Skills Through Cocktail Party Technique ( A Classroom Action Research of the Second Year Students of Smp Negeri 1 Ampel in 2015 / 2016 Academic year)

Tulgar, A. T. (2018). Speaking anxiety of foreign learners of Turkish in target context. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(2), 314-316.Camiré, M., Kendellen, K., Rathwell, S., & Turgeon, S. (2020). Evaluating the Coaching for Life Skills online training program: A randomised controlled trial. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 48(November 2019), 101649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101649

Chen, M., Mohammadi, M., & Izadpanah, S. (2024). Language learning through music on the academic achievement, creative thinking, and self-esteem of the English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. Acta Psychologica, 247(April), 104318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104318

Ebadi, S., Zandi, M., & Ajabshir, Z. F. (2024). The effect of language learning engagement on L2 motivation over Instagram. Acta Psychologica, 250(October), 104512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104512

Golshan, N., & Tafazoli, D. (2014). Technology-enhanced Language Learning Tools in Iranian EFL Context: Frequencies, Attitudes and Challenges. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.299

Hasan, M. K., Fakih, A. H., Ibna Seraj, P. M., & Hasmirati. (2022). The effect of technology-assisted language programme on vocabulary learning among EFL students at the tertiary level. Heliyon, 8(8), e10313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10313

Ilham Aufa, M., & Zuhriyah, M. (2024). Effectiveness of Using Board Race Games To Enhance Students’ Vocabulary Mastery. E-Link Journal, 11(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.30736/ej.v11i1.1043

Mahdi, H. S., Mohsen, M. A., & Almanea, M. (2024). Multimedia glosses and second language vocabulary learning: A second-round meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 248(January), 104341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104341

Orosoo, M., Raash, N., Treve, M., Hassan, H. F., Alshammry, N., Ramesh, J. V. N., & Rengarajan, M. (2025). Transforming English language learning: Advanced speech recognition with MLP-LSTM for personalized education. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 111(October 2024), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.10.065

Pop, M.-C. (2015). Course Material Design Using the New Technologies in Language for Specific Purposes Teaching and Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.774

Sa’adah, L., & Daning Hentasmaka. (2024). Online Language Assessment on Secondary Schools: an Investigation on Students’ Perception and Preference. E-Link Journal, 11(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.30736/ej.v11i1.1078

Schwartz, E., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Blau, I. (2023). Teacher prototypes in technology-enhanced instruction in elementary school second language acquisition: Comparing routine and emergency learning in different cultures. Computers and Education Open, 5(August), 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100155

Ulul Azmi, D., & Anjarwati, R. (2024). Learning Listening By Using Lyricstraining: Students’ Perception. E-Link Journal, 11(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.30736/ej.v11i1.1070

Yao-Ping Peng, M., Xu, Y., & Xu, C. (2023). Enhancing students’ English language learning via M-learning: Integrating technology acceptance model and S-O-R model. Heliyon, 9(2), e13302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13302

Zabrodina, I. K., Bogdanova, A. G., Bogdanova, O. V., Lilenko, I. Y., & Richter, S. O. (2015). Experimental Learning of Foreign Language with the Socio-cultural Skills Development Method by Means of Modern Internet Technologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 215(June), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.602

Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). Evaluating the AI dialogue System’s intercultural, humorous, and empathetic dimensions in English language learning: A case study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(December 2023), 100262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100262

Zhang, Z., Gao, X. (Andy), & Liu, T. (2024). Enjoyment in foreign language learning: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(17), e37215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37215

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Darmawan, A. A., Alfan Hariri, M.Pd, & Dimas Vega. (2024). Students’ Attitude in Using Artificial Intelligence Based Speaking Activity in Classroom. E-LINK JOURNAL, 11(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.30736/ej.v11i2.1125