Students' Scientific Writing Skills With Disciplinary Literacy Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30736/rf.v11i1.635Keywords:
Disciplinary literacy, laboratory work, scientific writing skillsAbstract
Scientific writing skills are a very urgent need for students. This study aims to show the effect of the implementation of disciplinary literacy instruction as a strategy for scientific writing skills. The population of the study is the senior high school in Sleman region with  quasi-experimental method. The results of two replications were analyzed and showed normal and homogeneous results. This indicates that there is no difference in the learning outcomes of the two classes and shows the similarity of the cognitive abilities of the two classes, so research may proceed. The treatment given was in the form of disciplining literacy habits in students by using articles that contained problem-solving. Data collection using authentic assessment was in the form of student laboratory work reports. The analysis technique used to analyze the effect of the implementation of disciplinary literacy instruction on scientific writing skills was ANOVA test analysis at 0.05 significance level. The results showed that the sig value below 0.05 that is 0.01. This number indicates that there is an effect of the implementation of disciplinary literacy instruction to the students' writing skills on the material of electrolyte and non-electrolyte solution in the first grade of senior high school.
Â
Downloads
References
Aiken, L.R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Alharthi, S. (2021). From Instructed Writing to Free-Writing: A Study of EFL Learners. SAGE Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211007112
Aukerman, M., & Beach, R. (2018). Student Conceptualizations of Task, Audience, and Self in Writing College Admissions Essays. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 62(3), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.888
Biesman-Simons, C., Dixon, K., Pretorius, E., & Reed, Y. (2020). Pitfalls and possibilities in literacy research: A review of South African literacy studies, 2004-2018. Reading and Writing (South Africa), 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/RW.V11I1.238
Chauvin, R., & Theodore, K. (2015). Teaching content-area literacy and disciplinary literacy. SEDL Insights, 3(1), 1–10.
Deane, P., O’Reilly, T., Chao, S. F., & Dreier, K. (2018). Writing Processes in Short Written Responses to Questions Probing Prior Knowledge. ETS Research Report Series, 2018(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12226
Faggella-Luby, M., Lindo, E., Jimerson, J. B., Payne, K., Keaney, L., & Buckley, K. (2020). A University–Lab School Writing Partnership Project: Benefits of Curriculum-Based Measures and Intervention for Students With Learning Differences. Reading Teacher, 74(2), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1938
General Directorate of Primary and Secondary Education. (2017). General Literacy Material in Learning. Ministry of Education and Culture.
Gere, A. R., Limlamai, N., Wilson, E., MacDougall Saylor, K., & Pugh, R. (2019). Writing and Conceptual Learning in Science: An Analysis of Assignments. Written Communication, 36(1), 99–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318804820
Goldbort, R. (2006). Writing for Science: The most comprehensive writing guide available for science students and professional researchers.
Graham, S., Daley, S. G., Aitken, A. A., Harris, K. R., & Robinson, K. H. (2018). Do writing motivational beliefs predict middle school students’ writing performance? Journal of Research in Reading, 41(4), 642–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12245
Grysko, R. A., & Zygouris-Coe, V. (Vicky) I. (2020). Supporting Disciplinary Literacy and Science Learning in Grades 3–5. Reading Teacher, 73(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1860
Hein, S. F. (2019). Deleuze, Immanence, and Immanent Writing in Qualitative Inquiry: Nonlinear Texts and Being a Traitor to Writing. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418784328
Kane, T. S. (1988). The Essential Guide to Writing. England: Oxford University Press.
Kim, Y. S. G. (2020). Structural relations of language and cognitive skills, and topic knowledge to written composition: A test of the direct and indirect effects model of writing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 910–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12330
Kim, Y. S. G., Gatlin, B., Al Otaiba, S., & Wanzek, J. (2018). Theorization and an Empirical Investigation of the Component-Based and Developmental Text Writing Fluency Construct. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(4), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417712016
Masoud, M. I., & Al Muhtaseb, A. H. (2019). Improving engineering students’ writing/presentation skills using laboratory/mini-project report. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720919833051
McCormack-Colbert, A., Ware, J., & Wyn Jones, S. (2018). Developing writing skills of learners with persistent literacy difficulties through explicit grammar teaching. Support for Learning, 33(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12200
Nigro, L., Jiménez-Fernández, G., Simpson, I. C., & Defior, S. (2015). Implicit Learning of Written Regularities and Its Relation to Literacy Acquisition in a Shallow Orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(5), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9303-9
O’Malley, j and Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic Assessment for English Language Learners: Practical Approaches for Teacher. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Orr, B. T. B. (n.d.). Praise for “ Ace the SAT Writing Even If You Hate to Write .â€
Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2014). Literacy and Education: Understanding the New Literacy Studies in the Classroom. Literacy and Education: Understanding the New Literacy Studies in the Classroom. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915237
Pham, V. P. H. (2021). The Effects of Collaborative Writing on Students’ Writing Fluency: An Efficient Framework for Collaborative Writing. SAGE Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021998363
Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2019). Contrasting Writing Practice Formats in a Writing Strategy Tutoring System. In Journal of Educational Computing Research (Vol. 57, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118763429
Peat, J., Elliott, E., Baur, L., & Keena, V. (2002.). Scientific Writing: Easy When You Know How. London: BMJ books.
Schillings, M., Roebertsen, H., Savelberg, H., & Dolmans, D. (2018). A review of educational dialogue strategies to improve academic writing skills. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418810663
Spear-Swerling, L., & Zibulsky, J. (2014). Making time for literacy: Teacher knowledge and time allocation in instructional planning. Reading and Writing, 27(8), 1353–1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9491-y
Standards, R. (2003). Raising Standards in Literacy. In Raising Standards in Literacy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166222
Wargo, K. (2020). A Conceptual Framework for Authentic Writing Assignments: Academic and Everyday Meet. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 63(5), 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1022
Wissinger, D. R., & De La Paz, S. (2020). Effects of Discipline-Specific Strategy Instruction on Historical Writing Growth of Students With Writing Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420904343
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Penulis yang mempublikasikan naskahnya pada Jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis, dan penulis mengakui bahwa Reforma : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran berhak sebagai pihak yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Lisensi ini mengizinkan setiap orang untuk:
- Berbagi — menyalin dan menyebarluaskan kembali materi ini dalam bentuk atau format apapun;
- Adaptasi — menggubah, mengubah, dan membuat turunan dari materi ini untuk kepentingan apapun, termasuk kepentingan komersial.
Berdasarkan ketentuan berikut:
- Atribusi —Mereka harus mencantumkan nama yang sesuai, mencantumkan tautan terhadap lisensi, dan menyatakan bahwa telah ada perubahan yang dilakukan. Mereka dapat melakukan hal ini dengan cara yang sesuai, namun tidak mengisyaratkan bahwa pemberi lisensi mendukung Mereka atau penggunaan Mereka.
- BerbagiSerupa — Apabila Mereka menggubah, mengubah, atau membuat turunan dari materi ini, Mereka harus menyebarluaskan kontribusi Mereka di bawah lisensi yang sama dengan materi asli.
- Tidak ada pembatasan tambahan — Mereka tidak dapat menggunakan ketentuan hukum atau sarana kontrol teknologi yang secara hukum membatasi orang lain untuk melakukan hal-hal yang diizinkan lisensi ini.
- Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif  dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain (misal: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dll), dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada Reforma : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
