Insights from a Teaching Assistance Program in Thailand: A Scientific Literacy Analysis of a Lower Secondary Science Textbook

Authors

  • Agustin Intan Permatasari Natural Science Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, State Islamic University of Kyai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
  • Dinar Maftukh Fajar Natural Science Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, State Islamic University of Kyai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
  • As’ari International Office, State Islamic University of Kyai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
  • Rorsi Che Muda Santivit Songkhla Technological College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/seaj.v8i1.1346

Keywords:

Content analysis, OECD framework, Science textbook, Thailand, Scientific literacy

Abstract

This study was conducted in response to the growing importance of scientific literacy as a key competence for students in the 21st century, particularly in relation to global challenges and evidence-based decision making. The research aims to analyze the presentation of scientific literacy in the Science and Technology textbook for Mattayom 3 Semester 2 used at Ban Kayae School, Narathiwat, Thailand, and to describe its strengths and limitations based on the OECD scientific literacy framework. A qualitative approach with content analysis design was employed. The unit of analysis included all chapters, learning activities, illustrations, and evaluation tasks in the textbook. Data were collected through documentation, checklist sheets based on three OECD competencies, and semi-structured interviews with two expert validators. Data were analyzed through coding, percentage calculation, and inter-rater agreement using Cohen’s Kappa. The results indicate that the textbook integrates the three core competencies of scientific literacy: explaining phenomena scientifically (35.1%), evaluating and designing scientific inquiry (32.4%), and interpreting data and evidence for decision making (32.2%), with relatively balanced distribution across chapters. Although certain chapters emphasize particular competencies, the book does not solely focus on conceptual knowledge but also incorporates inquiry and application aspects. The textbook is structurally aligned with OECD indicators and is considered worthy as a model for literacy-oriented science textbooks. Future development should strengthen authentic inquiry activities, contextual data analysis, and visual clarity to further enhance scientific literacy integration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dinar Maftukh Fajar, Natural Science Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, State Islamic University of Kyai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Natural Science Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

As’ari, International Office, State Islamic University of Kyai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

International Office

References

Afina, D. R., Hayati, M. N., & Fatkhurrohman, M. A. (2021). Profil Capaian Kompetensi Literasi Sains Siswa Smp Negeri Kota Tegal Menggunakan Pisa. Psej (Pancasakti Science Education Journal), 6(1), 10–21. Https://Doi.Org/10.24905/Psej.V6i1.111

Agustin, A. R., & Supahar. (2021). A Quantitative Analysis Of Indonesian Junior High School Science Textbooks For Scientific Literacy Themes. 752–761. Https://Doi.Org/10.2991/Assehr.K.210326.108

Akmam, A., Ahzari, S., Emiliannur, E., Anshari, R., & Setiawan, D. (2025). Enhancing Science Literacy Through Cognitive Conflict-Based Generative Learning Model: An Experimental Study In Physics Learning. Social Science And Humanities Journal, 9(07), 8507–8522. Https://Doi.Org/10.18535/Sshj.V9i07.1934

Alam, M. F., Uzair, M., & Arshad, U. (2022). Unfolding Graphic Representation In Science Textbooks At Intermediate Level: A Narratological Appraisal. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 6(2), 918–928.

Ayyoub, A., Jabali, O., Daraghmih, F., & Jabali, S. (2025). Assessing Courseware: Insights From Medical Students On Textbook Efficacy In Palestinian Medical Contexts. Journal Of Medical Education And Curricular Development, 12, 23821205251342099. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/23821205251342099

Budiningsih, T. Y., Rusilowati, A., & Marwoto, P. (2015). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Ipa Terpadu Berorientasi Literasi Sains Materi Energi Dan Suhu. Journal Of Innovative Science Education, 4(2). Https://Journal.Unnes.Ac.Id/Journals

Darmawati, V. D., Wulandari, A. Y. R., Putra, D. B. R. A., & Sulastri, E. (2025). Validitas Instrumen Soal Literasi Sains Pada Konteks Batik Madura Materi Unsur, Senyawa, Dan Campuran. Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa, 15(1), 173–183. Https://Doi.Org/10.37630/Jpm.V15i1.2284

Devetak, I., & Vogrinc, J. (2013). The Criteria For Evaluating The Quality Of The Science Textbooks. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Critical Analysis Of Science Textbooks (Pp. 3–15). Springer Netherlands. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/978-94-007-4168-3_1

El Islami, R. A. Z., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Comparative Study Of Scientific Literacy: Indonesian And Thai Pre-Service Science Teachers Report. International Journal Of Evaluation And Research In Education, 9(2), 261–268.

Fakhri, F., & Herlanti, Y. (2025). Analysis Of Science Literacy In Science Textbooks For Junior High School Based On The Revised 2013 Curriculum In West Jakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ipa, 16(2), 310–323.

Fayanto, S., Sulthoni, Wedi, A., Takda, A., & Fadilah, M. (2023). Exploration Of Integrated Science-Physics Textbooks Based On Science Literacy Indicators: A Case Study In Kendari City Indonesia. Anatolian Journal Of Education, 8(1), 159–172.

Firmansyah, M., Masrun, M., & S, I. D. K. Y. (2021). Esensi Perbedaan Metode Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Elastisitas : Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 3(2), 156–159.

Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2022). The Role Of Affect In Science Literacy For All. International Journal Of Science Education, 44(4), 535–555. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2036384

Garcia Barros, S., Martinez Lossada, C., & Rivadulla Lopez, J. (2021). Textbook Activities. Their Contribution To The Development Of The Scientific Literacy. Enseñanza De Las Ciencias, 39(1), 219–238.

Guo, D., Wright, K. L., & Mctigue, E. M. (2018). A Content Analysis Of Visuals In Elementary School Textbooks. The Elementary School Journal, 119(2), 244–269. Https://Doi.Org/10.1086/700266

Irhasyuarna, Y., Kusasi, M., Fahmi, F., Fajeriadi, H., Aulia, W. R., Nikmah, S., & Rahili, Z. (2022). Integrated Science Teaching Materials With Local Wisdom Insights To Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. Bio-Inoved : Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, 4(3), 328–334. Https://Doi.Org/10.20527/Bino.V4i3.14148

Kelp, N. C., Mccartney, M., Sarvary, M. A., Shaffer, J. F., & Wolyniak, M. J. (2023). Developing Science Literacy In Students And Society: Theory, Research, And Practice. Journal Of Microbiology & Biology Education, 24(2), E00058-23. Https://Doi.Org/10.1128/Jmbe.00058-23

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Permatasari, A. I., Dinar Maftukh, F., As’ari, & Muda, R. C. (2026). Insights from a Teaching Assistance Program in Thailand: A Scientific Literacy Analysis of a Lower Secondary Science Textbook. Science Education and Application Journal, 8(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.30736/seaj.v8i1.1346

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.